Refer to the graphic, after the ping 10.1.1.2 command is executed on R1, LSW1 receives a tagged data frame from VLAN 10 on LSW2.
Refer to the graphic, after the ping 10.1.1.2 command is executed on R1, LSW1 receives a tagged data frame from VLAN 10 on LSW2.
The configuration indicates that VLAN 10 is set up as tagged VLAN on the trunk ports between LSW1 and LSW2. In such a setup, traffic for VLAN 10 will be tagged. When the device R1 sends a ping to 10.1.1.2, which is the IP address configured on the VLAN 10 interface on LSW2, the response from LSW2 will return back tagged with VLAN 10 through the trunk link. Therefore, LSW1 will receive this tagged data frame.
The IP 10.1.1.2 is configured under interface vlan10 and it is under a trunk port. So, the come back of the ping have to be tagged. In my opinion, the answer is True.
Hyprid untagged vlan 10, vlan 20 is an invalid configuration by 802.1Q. You can have to tagged Vlans on a port, but not two untagged Vlans.
B. The answer will be True, if only just vlan assignment was previously configured on both switches. Example: [LSW1]vlan batch 10 20 [LSW2]vlan batch 10 20
it goes without saying that this has already been done
The IP 10.1.1.2 is configured under interface vlan10 and it is under a trunk port. So, the come back of the ping have to be tagged. In my opinion, the answer is True.