Refer to the exhibit.
A network administrator needs to deploy AOS-Switches that implement port-based tunneled node. Their Aruba controller has IP address 10.1.10.5/24. The architect has assigned tunneled-node endpoints to VLAN 20.
What is one issue with the current configuration planned for VLAN 20 on the switch?
For port-based tunneled node configurations, VLANs assigned to support tunneled-node endpoints typically do not have an IP address configured. This is because the VLAN is used to handle traffic that is tunneled to an Aruba controller, which means the IP addressing is managed by the controller, not the switch itself. Hence, VLAN 20 should not have an IP address.
I think correct answer is B
I think that B is the answer
Yes, interface can not support ip address