An administrator has ArubaOS-Switches that support tunneled node. The administrator wants to tunnel all user traffic from the Ethernet ports on the switches, and have the controllers authenticate the user traffic and apply the appropriate user role.
Which implementation meets these requirements?
The correct implementation is per-port tunneled node with the controllers configured for standalone mode. This setup allows the controllers to authenticate user traffic and apply the appropriate user role. Per-port tunneled node requires standalone controller configuration as it does not support clustering.
The answer is c. In Per-port tunneled node, the controller makes the role assignment and Per-port tunneled node is only supported in a standalone controller.
Per-role tunneled node is also supported by standalone controller but it cannot support cluster
Confirmed C --> Port-Based Tunnel / Supported in standalone MC, NO cluster support. (Table 16-1 Per port vs per user tunneled node, Official Student Guide)