Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam

Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Question 53


Your software team is developing an on-premises web application that requires direct connectivity to Compute Engine Instances in GCP using the RFC 1918 address space. You want to choose a connectivity solution from your on-premises environment to GCP, given these specifications:

✑ Your ISP is a Google Partner Interconnect provider.

✑ Your on-premises VPN device's internet uplink and downlink speeds are 10 Gbps.

✑ A test VPN connection between your on-premises gateway and GCP is performing at a maximum speed of 500 Mbps due to packet losses.

✑ Most of the data transfer will be from GCP to the on-premises environment.

✑ The application can burst up to 1.5 Gbps during peak transfers over the Interconnect.

✑ Cost and the complexity of the solution should be minimal.

How should you provision the connectivity solution?

Show Answer
Correct Answer: AC

Provisioning a Partner Interconnect through your ISP is the most appropriate solution. Partner Interconnect can offer a dedicated and reliable connection with defined bandwidth capabilities, which aligns well with the application's peak transfer requirement of 1.5 Gbps. Additionally, since the ISP is already a Google Partner Interconnect provider, the setup will be straightforward, minimizing both cost and complexity. Dedicated Interconnect, while providing a higher guaranteed bandwidth, would involve a more complex and potentially costlier setup process. Creating multiple VPN tunnels to counter packet loss and using ECMP would increase the complexity of the solution and might not effectively address the packet loss issues or provide the necessary bandwidth consistently. Network compression over VPNs would not sufficiently mitigate the packet loss problems and might not meet the required speeds for peak transfers.

Discussion

17 comments
Sign in to comment
garbadOption: A
Jan 17, 2021

Answer is A, cost and complexity of multiple tunnel vpn is very high, also , dedicated interconnect is not required as required max speed is 1.5gbps Also , direct connectivity is bogus verb, all the solution provide direct connectivity to your vpc instance , once connected through router

AzureDP900
Nov 27, 2022

A is right

JohnnyBGOption: A
Jul 24, 2021

Everybody that says C please do not take this exam and never be consulted for network related question ...

desertlotus1211
Aug 9, 2023

what makes you think PI is not complex? Relying on the partner to do their job is challenging. BTW - do you know the cost of PI vs VPN? do the math first

gcpengineer
Aug 9, 2023

vpn operation of having multiple tunnel at max 3-4 tunnels...rather hav a partner connect. if cost is factor, its better to stay in on prem

ThisisJohnOption: A
Nov 5, 2021

I would vote for A because of this statement " Most of the data transfer will be from GCP to the on-premises environment.". According to the documentation, carrier peering "Has reduced internet egress rates to your on-premises network " while Cloud VPN "Has standard egress rates for traffic sent through an Interconnect connection;" https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/how-to/choose-product#cp-compare

desertlotus1211Option: A
Dec 29, 2021

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking/google-cloud-network-connectivity-options-explained Answer A is better...

AzureDP900
Nov 29, 2022

Thank you for sharing the link, I agree with A.

Mr_MIXER007Option: A
Oct 4, 2022

AAAAAAAAAA

jeeet_Option: C
Jul 2, 2021

C, Question is challenging. --> application can burst upto 1.5Gbps, --> Cloud VPN- can burst upto 3Gbps, and with double VPN we can minimize packet loss and bandwidth upto 6Gbps, -> Interconnect initial setup is complex, you need to email to google, then talk to your vendor (which is google itself) and common peer zone. It's time consuming. Since they already have a single tunnel VPN, setting up another won't take much of time.

MrPajonkoOption: C
Dec 25, 2021

It states that private RFC 1918 ip addressing is required. Partner Interconnect doesn't use private IP addressing, public only. Correct answer is C.

MrPajonko
Dec 29, 2021

Sorry guys for misleading - Pricate Intercconect ofcourse use private IP addressing.

desertlotus1211
Dec 29, 2021

You need to revisit how Partner and Dedicated Interconnect works...Public IPs are only needed for BGP peering

kumarp6Option: A
Jan 4, 2022

Answer is : A

vladaniOption: A
Jan 25, 2022

Ans - A

Moran12Option: A
Oct 12, 2022

Partner would be cost effective as egress traffic would be lower than vpn

Komal697Option: B
Mar 30, 2023

Option B, provisioning a Dedicated Interconnect, is the most appropriate solution because it can provide a dedicated, private, high-speed connection between the on-premises environment and GCP. Dedicated Interconnects offer a guaranteed bandwidth of up to 10 Gbps, and can be upgraded for burstable traffic as needed. Additionally, they offer SLAs for reliability and support.

Komal697
Mar 30, 2023

Option A, provisioning a Partner Interconnect, could be a valid solution but may not provide the same guaranteed bandwidth as a Dedicated Interconnect, and may be subject to the same packet loss issues as a VPN. Option C, creating multiple VPN tunnels and using ECMP, could improve reliability and increase bandwidth, but may not provide the necessary speeds and guaranteed bandwidth for the application requirements. Option D, using network compression, could increase the amount of data transferred over the VPN, but would not address the issue of packet losses and may not provide the necessary speeds and reliability for the application requirements.

desertlotus1211
May 16, 2023

Partner Interconnect provided up to 10GB pipes... DI requires you to be in an area where DI are available. You already have your partner provider... no need to search and go through DI requirements. Minimal cost and complexity

xhilmiOption: A
Dec 22, 2023

Partner Interconnect (Option A): This solution involves using your ISP as a Google Partner Interconnect provider. It establishes a connection between your on-premises network and Google's network through the service provider. Partner Interconnect can offer a dedicated and reliable connection with specified bandwidth. Given the requirement for direct connectivity, the fact that your ISP is a Google Partner Interconnect provider, and considering factors like minimal cost and complexity, this could indeed be a suitable choice.

seddyOption: C
May 18, 2021

C for sure! Key elements: 1) Direct Connectivity (cannot be partner inter) 2) Cannot be Dedicated bc we want low cost 3) Multiple VPN tunnels with ECMP will help us deal with packet losses Peace :)

JohnnyBG
Jul 13, 2021

Partner interconnect IS a direct connectivity ..

clooudy
Nov 10, 2021

partner interconnect is a direct connectivity

pk349Option: C
Jan 14, 2023

• C. Create multiple VPN ***** tunnels to account for the packet losses, and increase bandwidth using ECMP. It’s very common to use parallel links to increase bandwidth. This mechanism is often called equal-cost multipath (ECMP). ECMP often works well, but there are a few caveats. Before we get to the issue of running BGP over parallel links, it’s important to look at how traffic is split over multiple parallel links. Dedicated Interconnect provides a direct physical connection between your on-premises network and Google's network. Partner Interconnect provides connectivity between your on-premises and VPC networks through a supported service provider.

PopaOption: A
Feb 26, 2023

It is A, partner interconnect. It supports RFC 1918 as well as required max speed. https://cloud.google.com/hybrid-connectivity/

desertlotus1211Option: A
Feb 20, 2024

Do the math people: https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/pricing#partner-pricing A 2 tunnel VPN is $297.80 per month.... A PI is $2.36 per hour per VLAN attachment (@10Gigs) plus data transfer.... ARE YOU SURE IT'S CHEAPER THAN VPN PER MONTH?

nkastanasOption: A
Jul 4, 2024

Dedicated Interconnect is for organizations that need high bandwidth, low latency, and have the capability to manage a direct physical connection in a colocation facility. Partner Interconnect is for organizations that prefer a simpler, more flexible setup and do not have the infrastructure to support a Dedicated Interconnect.