What shortcoming of the traditional PICERL incident response model is addressed by adopting a dynamic incident response model like DAIR?
What shortcoming of the traditional PICERL incident response model is addressed by adopting a dynamic incident response model like DAIR?
The traditional PICERL (Preparation, Identification, Containment, Eradication, Recovery, Lessons Learned) incident response model follows a linear approach where each step is performed in sequence. This linear approach can limit the effectiveness and flexibility needed during an incident response because real-world incidents often require dynamically revisiting and adjusting earlier steps based on new information or evolving threats. Adopting a dynamic incident response model like DAIR addresses this shortcoming by allowing more flexibility and adaptation during the response process.
I think the answer is "A"
I believe the answer is C.
Agree, option C is correct
The traditional PICERL model (Preparation, Identification, Containment, Eradication, Recovery, Lessons Learned) follows a linear approach where each step is performed in sequence. This can limit the effectiveness and flexibility needed during an incident response because real-world incidents often require revisiting and adjusting earlier steps based on new information or evolving threats.