Refer to the exhibit.
If both FortiManager and FortiGate are behind the NAT devices, what are the two expected results? (Choose two.)
nse5_fmg-72 Exam QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
nse5_fmg-72 Exam - Question 24
Show AnswerHide Answer
Correct Answer: ABC
When both FortiManager and FortiGate are behind NAT devices, the expected outcomes are: During discovery, the FortiManager NATed IP address is not set by default on FortiGate. This means that FortiGate won’t automatically know the FortiManager's NATed IP and it needs to be configured manually. Additionally, FortiGate is discovered by FortiManager through the FortiGate NATed IP address. This allows FortiManager to identify and manage FortiGate even when both are behind NAT devices.
Discussion
6 commentsGeniusAOptions: AC
Jan 31, 2024AC is the correct answer
talixOptions: AC
Jan 16, 2024A and C... page 279
DatBroNZOptions: AC
Jan 17, 2024Tricky one. It seems three answers are valid: A. Correct. It can be configured on the FortiGate, but it is not by default. B. Wrong. FortiManager does not attempt to reestablish the FGFM tunnel to the FortiGate NATed IP address. C. Correct. D. Correct.
TTOG
Jan 28, 2024D says "non-NATed", Fortigate wont be able to reach that address
jfffOptions: AC
Apr 10, 2024AC is the correct answer ortiManager does not attempt to reestablish the FGFM tunnel to the FortiGate
GoodServantOptions: BC
May 5, 2024Look at the study guide on page 277 and 279, it clearly states that when the FMG is behind a NATed IP, then it is ONLY the FMG that can discover a new device, and also is the only one that can re-establish the FGFM tunnel after it is torn down. Literally stated on the first paragraph of page 277. Page 279 where both are NATed, affirms that the scenario plays out exactly the same as when only the FMG was NATed. What I don't like about the question, is that A is also true, but only by deductive reasoning. So B and C are the better choices as they are clearly stated in the study guide as such.
Redrum702Options: AC
May 19, 2024AC: B is wrong: FortiManager doesn't automatically attempt to reestablish the FGFM tunnel if it is torn down.