Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a debug command.
What can be concluded from the debug command output?
Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a debug command.
What can be concluded from the debug command output?
The state of the OSPF neighbor with ID 0.0.0.117 is reported as Full/DROther. This status indicates that there are at least two other OSPF routers on the same network segment: one that is acting as the Designated Router (DR) and another that is acting as the Backup Designated Router (BDR). Therefore, there must be at least three OSPF routers present on the wan2 network.
A: is not right, because the pri is 1 B: is not right, because the state is Full D: is not right, because state "Full/-" is for point-to point OSPF networks. The only Option left is C, but it the state"Full/DRother" only explains that there are 2 OSPF routers and not more than 2.
C is correct
Can you explain why it's C?
To be specific - C MAY NOT be correct*, but A, B and D are DEFINITELY NOT correct. C is correct because state of the neighbor is DR (Drother) which means in that particular multiaccess network segment there are also DR (Destignated Router) and BDR (Backup Destignated Router). * It MAY not be correct because there can be only 2 routers: DR and DRO that has priority 0 configured. In that case there is no BDR.
If the neighbor 0.0.0.117 has Priority 1 and State DROther, it means there are at least 2 more routers in the segment that are DR and BDR, otherwise 0.0.0.117 would be either DR or BDR because it is eligible (prio!=0)
Makes sense. The first two neighbors are DR/BDR and are in the same subnet, and doesn't the router the command is done on have to be adjacent to the DR/BDR? Meaning there are more than two routers on the WAN2 network.
All other don't make sense
Enterprise_Firewall_7.0_Study_Guide-Online.pdf p 296
C - is correct
C is correct.
C is correct
C is correct