A Scrum Team suggests to have a project with 3 Sprints of 2 weeks, while the customer suggests 1 Sprint of 6 weeks.
What is the greatest advantage of having 3 Sprints of 2 weeks?
A Scrum Team suggests to have a project with 3 Sprints of 2 weeks, while the customer suggests 1 Sprint of 6 weeks.
What is the greatest advantage of having 3 Sprints of 2 weeks?
The greatest advantage of having 3 Sprints of 2 weeks is that the team can inspect and adapt 2 times. This frequent inspection and adaptation cycle allows the team to be more responsive to changes, improve processes based on feedback, and ensure that they are on the right path towards meeting customer requirements. It enhances the overall agility and flexibility of the project. Delivery of more Story Points is not necessarily guaranteed by shorter sprints, as it depends on various other factors including team performance, complexity of tasks, and accuracy of estimations.
The team delivers more Story Points.
Why is it not B?
You doing Inspect and Adapt several times during a sprint (In every daily meeting, in the sprint review, in the sprint retrospective,....). On top of this argumentation you have 3 sprints in the question, so you would inspect and adapat 3 times at least.