Which of the following standard represents a legal precedent set in 1993 by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony during federal legal proceedings?
Which of the following standard represents a legal precedent set in 1993 by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony during federal legal proceedings?
The Daubert standard is a legal precedent established by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1993 in the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. This standard set guidelines for the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony in federal legal proceedings, emphasizing the reliability and relevance of the scientific evidence presented.
NOT on Computer Hacking Forensics Investigator (CHFI) Version 10 (Volumes 1 through 4)
couldn't find it either.
509 U.S. 579 (1993) references Daubert (1993). It isn't in the EC Council book.
D < https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/daubert_standard
Here's a brief explanation of the other options: A. SWGDE & SWGIT: Organizations that provide guidelines and standards for digital evidence and forensic analysis, but not related to the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony. B. IOCE: Not a recognized standard or precedent. C. Frye: A 1923 court case (Frye v. United States) that established a predecessor standard to Daubert, which has largely been replaced by the Daubert standard.
The correct answer is D. Daubert. The Daubert standard is a legal precedent set in 1993 by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. It established guidelines for the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony in federal legal proceedings, focusing on the reliability and relevance of the expert's testimony. The Daubert standard requires that expert testimony be: Based on sufficient facts or data The product of reliable principles and methods Relevant to the case at hand This standard has had a significant impact on the admission of expert testimony in federal courts and has been widely adopted in state courts as well.