The marketing team is looking to share data in an aggregate table with the sales organization, but the field names used by the teams do not match, and a number of marketing-specific fields have not been approved for the sales org.
Which of the following solutions addresses the situation while emphasizing simplicity?
Creating a view on the marketing table is the best solution for sharing data with the sales organization while keeping it simple. By selecting only the fields approved for the sales team and aliasing names to match the sales naming conventions, this approach ensures that no unauthorized data is shared and that the naming is consistent. Additionally, views are easy to create and maintain, and they always reflect the most up-to-date data without the need for complex synchronization processes or additional data storage.
Creating a view is a simple and efficient way to provide access to a subset of data from a table. In this case, the view can be configured to include only the fields that have been approved for the sales team. Additionally, any fields that need to be renamed to match the sales team’s naming conventions can be aliased in the view. This approach does not require the creation of additional tables or the configuration of jobs to sync data, making it a relatively straightforward solution. However, it’s important to note that views do not physically store data, so any changes to the underlying marketing table will be reflected in the view. This means that the sales team will always have access to the most up-to-date approved data.
Looks like A to me
A is the simplest