A natural disaster has occurred in a remote area that is approximately 40 miles from the response team headquarters. The response team must setup a local wireless network using 802.11 WLAN access points. What is the best method, of those listed, for implementation of a network backhaul for communications across the Internet in this scenario?
In a scenario where rapid deployment is required, especially in a remote area affected by a natural disaster, Cellular/LTE is the most practical and effective solution for implementing a network backhaul. LTE networks are designed for wide coverage and can provide reliable internet access without the need for extensive infrastructure setup. Temporary wired solutions like cable or DSL would be impractical due to the difficulty and time required to lay down physical lines, especially over a distance of 40 miles. 802.11 bridging is not suitable for such long distances and would likely suffer from signal degradation and reliability issues. Therefore, Cellular/LTE offers the best balance of speed, reliability, and ease of deployment in this context.
Isn't the answer supposed to be B here? The question states 'The response team must setup a local wireless network using 802.11 WLAN access points.' While Cellular/LTE is feasible, it is not part of the 802.11 standard. So I think B is correct.
C could be correct.
perfect
Is asking what is the best method of those listed to implement a network backhaul.does not specify the backhaul needs to be 802.11. I will say lte
I will go for C, 40 miles for a radio point to point seems a bit too far