A penetration tester wrote the following comment in the final report: "Eighty-five percent of the systems tested were found to be prone to unauthorized access from the internet."
Which of the following audiences was this message intended?
A penetration tester wrote the following comment in the final report: "Eighty-five percent of the systems tested were found to be prone to unauthorized access from the internet."
Which of the following audiences was this message intended?
The statement 'Eighty-five percent of the systems tested were found to be prone to unauthorized access from the internet' is framed in a high-level summary format, emphasizing the severity of the issue without providing detailed technical specifics. This type of summary is typically intended for C-suite executives, as it conveys the overall security posture and the potential business impact of security issues in broad terms. Executives need this high-level information to make informed strategic decisions regarding the organization's security policies and resource allocation.
The other 3 are going to want way more details than this.
Although the information is important for system administrators, because of the lack of technical details provided this seems to be geared towards executives as part of an executive summary given how it briefly emphasizes the issue and does not go into any low-level detail of the technical issue or how it can be remediated.
The message “Eighty-five percent of the systems tested were found to be prone to unauthorized access from the internet” in the final report of a penetration test was intended for systems administrators. Systems administrators are responsible for managing and maintaining computer systems, including security measures such as firewalls, antivirus software, and intrusion detection systems. They are the ones who will be responsible for implementing the recommendations made in the report to improve the security posture of the systems.
B. C-suite executives: concerned with the overall security posture of the organization. They need to understand the severity and potential business impact of security issues in broad terms to make informed strategic decisions. Explanation: A. Systems administrators: While systems administrators are concerned with technical details and specific vulnerabilities, this statement is more of a high-level summary statistic rather than a detailed technical finding. C. Data privacy ombudsman: While they are concerned with data privacy issues, this role typically focuses on compliance with data protection laws and might be more interested in specific data-related vulnerabilities rather than the general state of system security. D. Regulatory officials: Regulatory officials are more concerned with compliance and whether the organization meets specific regulatory requirements. This statement does not address compliance directly but rather indicates a security posture.
I would say it is typically intended for B. C-suite executives. C-suite executives, such as the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) and CIO (Chief Information Officer), are responsible for making high-level strategic decisions for the organization. This kind of information is critical for them to understand the security posture of the organization's systems and the potential risks associated with unauthorized access. It is important for executives to be aware of vulnerabilities and security issues that could impact the organization's operations, reputation, and legal compliance. While systems administrators, data privacy ombudsmen, and regulatory officials may also have a vested interest in such findings, the message is often first communicated to top-level executives, who can then decide on the appropriate actions and resource allocation to address the identified security concerns.