A junior security researcher has identified a buffer overflow vulnerability leading to remote code execution in a former employer's software. The security researcher asks for the manager's advice on the vulnerability submission process. Which of the following is the best advice the current manager can provide the security researcher?
In a scenario where a junior security researcher has identified a buffer overflow vulnerability leading to remote code execution in their former employer's software, consulting with legal experts is the most prudent step. Legal consultation ensures that the researcher adheres to both legal and ethical standards, protects their rights, and helps them navigate any potential legal ramifications of disclosing the vulnerability. This not only safeguards the researcher from legal risks but also maintains professional integrity in the vulnerability submission process.
Legal consultation is crucial before proceeding with any vulnerability disclosure process, especially when dealing with vulnerabilities found in former employers' software. It ensures that the researcher adheres to legal and ethical standards, protects their rights, and avoids potential legal risks associated with disclosure. Therefore, advising the security researcher to seek legal consultation is the most prudent course of action in this situation.