Exam CAS-004 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 230

Prior to a risk assessment inspection, the Chief Information Officer tasked the systems administrator with analyzing and reporting any configuration issues on the information systems, and then verifying existing security settings. Which of the following would be BEST to use?

    Correct Answer: A

    The Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) is a comprehensive set of standards that can automate the process of vulnerability management, security measurement, and compliance evaluation. It includes mechanisms for checking system configuration settings and identifying vulnerabilities. SCAP encompasses various components like XCCDF, which specifically deals with security configuration checklists, making it the most suitable choice for analyzing and reporting configuration issues and verifying existing security settings in information systems.

Discussion
Trap_D0_rOption: A

Lol obviously a lot of people here who are missing anything resembling real world experience. Without even knowing what the acronyms mean: If you've ever worked in secure computing, you've done SCAP scans. You have never, ever, once ever in your life, done an XCCDF scan. The question is about gathering system compliance information. Anyone with more than 5 minutes of experience should see SCAP and be like "yeah that's the one."

FoxTrotDGOption: A

By using SCAP, the systems administrator would be able to analyze and report configuration issues on the information systems and verify existing security settings more effectively than by using XCCDF alone.

Cock

It is true that the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) can be used to assess and report configuration issues and security settings, just like XCCDF. However, XCCDF is specifically designed to describe, assess and report security configuration settings or checklists while SCAP is broader in scope and includes other features such as vulnerability management, standards adherence, and compliance.

FoxTrotDG

So SCAP scanners are more focused on identifying vulnerabilities and XCCDF is more focused on describing security configurations. But SCAP includes XCCDF as one of its components. So you're saying that SCAP is overkill and more than what's necessary for the job?

IT_Dude_Err404Option: A

A. SCAP The Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) is a method used for automating technical control compliance activities. SCAP includes mechanisms for automatically checking system configuration settings and identifying any vulnerabilities. Therefore, SCAP is the best tool for analyzing and reporting configuration issues on information systems and verifying existing security settings. On the other hand, CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is a free and open industry standard for assessing the severity of computer system security vulnerabilities. XCCDF (eXtensible Configuration Checklist Description Format) is a component of SCAP and is a specification language for writing security checklists, benchmarks, and related kinds of documents. CMDB (Configuration Management Database) is a database that contains all relevant information about the components of the information system used in an organization's IT services and the relationships between those components. So among all the options, SCAP is the most comprehensive and suitable one for the task. Source: ChatGPT

p1s3cOption: A

A. SCAP (Security Content Automation Protocol) is a collection of open standards for automating the assessment, measurement, and reporting of security configurations and vulnerabilities across IT systems. SCAP includes a suite of tools and technologies, including the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) dictionary, the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE) dictionary, and the Extensible Configuration Checklist Description Format (XCCDF), among others. By using SCAP, the systems administrator can analyze and report configuration issues on the information systems and verify existing security settings efficiently. Therefore, the BEST option is A. SCAP.

CockOption: C

C. XCCDF (eXtensible Configuration Checklist Description Format) would be the BEST to use for analyzing and reporting any configuration issues on the information systems, and then verifying existing security settings. XCCDF is a specification language for writing security checklists, benchmarks, and related documents, designed to be used with security automation technologies, like SCAP (Security Content Automation Protocol) and OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language). Using XCCDF, the systems administrator can define and document the desired secure configuration settings and then use security automation tools, such as SCAP or OpenSCAP, to scan systems against those settings and report any discrepancies.

AnarckiiOption: A

its asking for the "BEST" so A. SCAP. XCCDF is offered inside of SCAP so there are other resources to be used with it in place

encxorbloodOption: A

C is a part of A

Serliop378Option: C

Key word: configuration issues

rmwilsn

correct. configuration issues. not the language of the machine readable input. scap is the entity for config. xccdf is the language. answer is A

23169fdOption: B

SCAP is a set of standards used to automate the process of vulnerability management, security measurement, and compliance evaluation. It includes specifications for expressing and manipulating security data and provides a comprehensive framework for security configuration and vulnerability checking.

Ariel235788Option: C

To analyze and report configuration issues on information systems and verify existing security settings, the best tool or standard to use is: C. XCCDF (Extensible Configuration Checklist Description Format). Explanation: XCCDF (Extensible Configuration Checklist Description Format): XCCDF is a standardized format for expressing security checklists and configuration guidance. It is often used in conjunction with SCAP (Security Content Automation Protocol) to assess and manage system configurations. XCCDF allows you to define security checks, benchmarks, and configuration settings that can be used to analyze systems for compliance with security policies and standards. It's a suitable choice for assessing and reporting configuration issues and security settings.