A security analyst inspects the header of an email that is presumed to be malicious and sees the following:

Which of the following is inconsistent with the rest of the header and should be treated as suspicious?
A security analyst inspects the header of an email that is presumed to be malicious and sees the following:
Which of the following is inconsistent with the rest of the header and should be treated as suspicious?
The sender's email address is suspicious. The email header shows that the email was received from 'sonic306-20.navigator.mail.company.com', which does not correspond to the yahoo.com domain of the sender's email address ([email protected]). This inconsistency is a common indicator of email spoofing or other malicious activity.
Its B, but it was sent by "sonic306-20.navigator.mail.company.com", not yahoo. The google server is to be expected since "to" is a gmail.com email. (It's like by-direction-of) Just check your own gmail headers.
The sender is yahoo but the header indicates google
The google there is expected since it’s sent to a google mail, that’s the delivery. It’s the sonic address that does not correspond with senders yahoo email.
I say B
B is the correct answer
B. The From and "received from" domains do not match.
unbelievable what a lack of attention on your part! Sonic306 is not an email address but a server through which the email passed, if you have GMAIL, open an email and look in the header. Received: from mail1.static.mailgun.info (mail1.static.mailgun.info. [104.130.122.1]) by mx.google.com with UTF8SMTPS id r9-20020a05622a034900b003f52c2fa74dsi4072172qtw.146.2023.05.22.09.48.04 for <<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ab9f989e989f989999ebccc6cac2c785c8c4c6">[email protected]</a>>