A company is deploying a SAN at headquarters and a branch office 1,000mi (1,609km) away that will access small amounts of data. Which of the following types of connections would be MOST cost effective to implement?
A company is deploying a SAN at headquarters and a branch office 1,000mi (1,609km) away that will access small amounts of data. Which of the following types of connections would be MOST cost effective to implement?
The most cost-effective option for connecting a SAN over a long distance would be iSCSI. iSCSI (Internet Small Computer System Interface) is known for its cost efficiency because it uses standard Ethernet networks and the TCP/IP protocol to transmit SCSI commands. This allows it to operate over existing IP networks without needing specialized cabling or equipment, unlike Fibre Channel (FC) or Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE). Given the company's need to connect a branch office 1,000 miles away, iSCSI would be suitable due to its ability to handle long-distance connections cost-effectively.
iSCSI (IP Small Computer System Interface) - Lower cost, built using Ethernet switches (<10 Gbps) - Relies on configuration allowing jumbo frames over the network - Jason Dion -
iSCSI (Internet Small Computer System Interface) is a cost-effective way to connect to a SAN over a long distance. It uses standard Ethernet networks and TCP/IP protocol to transmit SCSI commands, allowing it to run over existing IP networks. This makes it less expensive to implement than Fibre Channel (FC) or Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) which require specialized cabling and equipment. Additionally, iSCSI can be used to connect to both local and remote storage devices, making it a suitable option for the branch office scenario you described.
ISCSI defo lads
ISCSI is cost effective
This is the correct answer, as the question is only asking about cost Mike Meyers "Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) is built on top of TCP/IP, enabling devices that use the SCSI protocol to communicate across existing networks using cheap, readily available hardware." Jason Dion "iSCSI (IP Small Computer System Interface) - Lower cost, built using Ethernet switches (<10 Gbps) - Relies on configuration allowing jumbo frames over the network"
ISCSI as they are asking what is cost effective.
FIber channel over internet
FCoE is a protocol no a connection
Ok, how about iSCSI then? Not a protocol? I also think that A, rather than B, is correct. But if you take the time to comment, take the time to do it properly...
chat gpt says about Iscsi: Widely used in small to medium-sized businesses, remote office environments, and virtualization platforms (like VMware) where affordable and flexible storage solutions are needed.
I will go with A on this one iSCSI is more cost-effective and covers longer distances
I will choose iSCI ...
Correct me if im wrong but this is what I’ve read. FCoE is substantially more expensive than iSCSI due to these requirements and restrictions to implement. It also often requires specific licenses to enable its functionality. https://www.mirazon.com/iscsi-vs-fcoe/