Which of the following best describes why a client would hold a lessons-learned meeting with the penetration-testing team?
Which of the following best describes why a client would hold a lessons-learned meeting with the penetration-testing team?
A lessons-learned meeting with the penetration-testing team is primarily held to review and reflect on the entire assessment process. The goal is to identify any processes that failed to meet expectations during the assessment. This involves examining the testing procedures, communication, scope coverage, and any issues that arose, in order to develop strategies for improvement in future tests. This comprehensive review helps to ensure continuous improvement and effectiveness of future penetration tests.
The lessons learned does not focus on the report structure, so it cannot be A. The only answer that makes sense is C. This meeting would be a chance for the client and the penetration-testing team to discuss the assessment comprehensively. They would examine the testing process, communication effectiveness, scope coverage, incident handling, and any issues that arose. The goal is to identify any shortcomings or challenges in the engagement and to develop strategies for improvement in future tests.
A lessons-learned meeting is held between the client and the penetration-testing team after the assessment process to discuss the assessment process and its outcomes. The primary objective of this meeting is to identify areas of improvement for future assessments. Therefore, the correct answer is A. To provide feedback on the report structure and recommend improvements.
You’re not reading it right. A is referencing the pentest report. As in the client wants to give feedback to the pentesting team on how they can make their report better in the future. What you attempted to describe and align with that option is actually C lol
C lesson learned meeting is not for improving the report. It's not a college
C. A lessons-learned meeting is typically conducted to reflect on the entire process of the penetration test, identifying what went well and what did not, with the goal of improving future assessments. This involves discussing various aspects of the assessment, including any shortcomings or failures in processes, communication, preparation, execution, and overall coordination. A. To provide feedback on the report structure and recommend improvements: While this might be a part of the discussion, it is not the primary reason for a lessons-learned meeting. B. To discuss the findings and dispute any false positives: This would generally be handled in a separate debrief or review meeting specifically focused on the results and their accuracy. D. This is an important aspect of the post-assessment process, but it would typically be covered in the final steps of the project, following the standard protocols and agreements, not necessarily in a lessons-learned meeting.
Lessons-learned = understand what processes have failed to meet expectations.
a is the best option in this case