Exam 1Y0-402 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Go to Exam
Question 23

Scenario: A Citrix Architect needs to design a new XenApp and XenDesktop environment.

The architect has identified the Resource Layer requirements shown in the Exhibit.

Click the Exhibit button to view the requirements.

Additionally, management at the organization has identified the following general Resource Layer requirements:

✑ The profile solution should minimize logon and logoff times as much as possible.

✑ The time required to configure and maintain the solution should be minimized.

✑ User groups do NOT need to use the same profile type.

Which profile type should the architect use for the Customer Service group?

    Correct Answer: B

    The Customer Service group does not require user settings to persist, which means each user session can start with a clean slate. Using a mandatory profile ensures that profiles do not become bloated over time, which can help minimize logon and logoff times, aligning with the requirement to minimize profile sizes and configuration time. Mandatory profiles are also easy to configure and maintain, as they remain constant across sessions. Therefore, the mandatory profile type is the best choice for this group.

Discussion
ijhoojhisdojihoijOption: B

B. No personalization is required and this prevents bloated profiles. Each session, the users are starting with a clean profile.

thedelphOption: B

I'd go with B

d0bermannnOption: B

B. Mandatory

reesewonOption: C

It is C because time required to configure is minimized, and it specifically says they do NOT need to use the same profile type

kepler

Local can also be a solution. However, Local poses profile bloat (increased logon time, yes even locally. Imagine loading 5GB of profiles, or laerger). Local profile also means providing access to shell folders (download, documents, desktops, etc., which can cause significant profile size increase). Mandatory profile only needs very minimal configuration (changing ntuser.dat to ntuser.man globally, once for all). Answer B is correct