Refer to the exhibit. A company is evaluating multiple network management system tools. Trending graphs generated by SNMP data are returned by the NMS and appear to have multiple gaps. While troubleshooting the issue, an engineer noticed the relevant output. Which action resolves the gaps in the graphs?
The exhibit shows that the Network Management System (NMS) traffic is being policed with a Committed Information Rate (CIR) of 50,000 bps, and packets exceeding this rate are being dropped. Specifically, a significant number of packets (990,012 packets) and bytes (94,030,134 bytes) have exceeded the CIR and were dropped. This can lead to gaps in the SNMP data collected by the NMS. To resolve this, segregating the NMS traffic into multiple class maps based on specific protocols and assigning appropriate Control Plane Policing (CoPP) actions would allow for a finer control over the policing settings. This way, critical NMS traffic can be given a higher priority or a higher CIR, ensuring smoother and continuous data collection without gaps.
See my comment below, actual fix is not stated but i go with D as (partly) disabling CoPP with A seems a bad idea
both A and D would work,
Shouldn’t it be applied to management plane for NMS applications?
both A and D would work, Don't see how this is an appropriate question...
Indeed the question is to solve the ACTUAL problem. Answer D is just to redo the entire thing. It should say, "allowing snmp to use more bandwith, or higher cir for snmp traffic" that could be a clear indication....A fixes it, maybe D fixes it more fancy, but the proof snmp is dropped less quickly is not actually stated.