Refer to the exhibit. An engineer wanted to set a tag of 30 to route 10.1.80.65/32 but it failed.
How is the issue fixed?
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer wanted to set a tag of 30 to route 10.1.80.65/32 but it failed.
How is the issue fixed?
To set a tag of 30 to the route 10.1.80.65/32, the route-map entry must match the appropriate prefix-list. The route 10.1.80.65/32 falls within the range defined by prefix-list ccnp2 (10.1.80.0/24 le 32). The correct approach is to modify the route-map entry to match this prefix-list under the desired permit sequence. Therefore, modifying route-map ospf-to-eigrp permit 10 to match prefix-list ccnp2 will correctly set the tag to 30 for the given route.
I chose A as D just does not make sense it would set a tag to be 10 not 30
A is correct ...
The correct answer is A
This seems straight forward....Answer is A
i think the answer is A
A is correct
A is correct
A is the right answer.
A is the correct one
A is correct
D is the correct one, the prefix list is always added to the end unless the sequence keyword is mentioned so to make any changes modify the last or add seq 40
A is correct D doesnt make any sense
A is the correct answer
A is correct.
A is the best answer
It is necessary that "ccnp2" and "30" are in the same route map.
correct answer is A. 10.1.80.65/32 needed to add tag 30 so we must modify route-map ospf-to-eigrp permit 10 to match ip prefix-list ccnp2