Refer to the exhibit. The static route is not present in the routing table of an adjacent OSPF neighbor router. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. The static route is not present in the routing table of an adjacent OSPF neighbor router. Which action resolves the issue?
Without the word "subnets", only the classfull networks will be redistributed
Router> enable Router# configure terminal Router(config)# router ospf <process-id> Router(config-router)# redistribute static SUBNETS Use the "redistribute" command to redistribute the static route into OSPF. Specify the source of the static route and any necessary parameters.
the given answer is correct: The command to distribute static route via OSPF in Cisco IOS Router is “redistribute static subnets” https://www.mustbegeek.com/distribute-static-route-via-ospf-in-cisco-ios-router/
I tested it in lab without the subnet keyword and without route-map permit 20, the static route got redistributed !!!!so i checked the configuration (show run | sec router ospf) and it turns out that the subnet key word was automatically there
D is correct. https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/redistribute-static-subnet-to-ospf/td-p/1281958
answer is correct: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/cloud-systems-management/network-automation-and-management/dna-center/2-2-2/user_guide/b_cisco_dna_center_ug_2_2_2/b_cisco_dna_center_ug_2_2_2_chapter_0111.html
D is correct
The correct answer is D Router(config-router)#redistribute sta Router(config-router)#redistribute static ? metric Metric for redistributed routes metric-type OSPF/IS-IS exterior metric type for redistributed routes nssa-only Limit redistributed routes to NSSA areas route-map Route map reference subnets Consider subnets for redistribution into OSPF tag Set tag for routes redistributed into OSPF <cr>
route-map has a very specific match condition...which is the prefix-list...that is the ONLY thing matched and therefore redistributed. If you want to allow anything else you have to write a condition for it...in this case A is correct.
i don't know why? In lab. it is same result without subnets keyword. all subnets are redistributed whatever classful or not. Is that different in OS version ?
I could be wrong here but I think I have seen videos of redistribution where the instructor states that in latest iOS versions the subnets keywords is already assumed by default and doesn't need to be added. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
True. Please see: https://www.kwtrain.com/blog/route-redistribution-part-1