Refer to the exhibit. The network administrator configured the Chicago router to mutually redistribute the LA and NewYork routes with OSPF routes to be summarized as a single route in EIGRP using the longest summary mask: router eigrp 100 redistribute ospf 1 metric 10 10 10 10 10 router ospf 1 redistribute eigrp 100 subnets
!
interface E 0/0
ip summary-address eigrp 100 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
After the configuration, the New York router receives all the specific LA routes but the summary route. Which set of configurations resolves the issue on the
Chicago router?