Refer to the exhibit. An engineer configures DMVPN and receives the hub location prefix of 10.1.1.0/24 on R2 and R3. The R3 prefix of 10.1.3.0/24 is not received on R2, and the R2 prefix 10.1.2.0/24 is not received on R3. Which action resolves the issue?
The issue arises due to the split horizon rule, which prevents an interface from advertising a route back out the same interface on which it was received. In the context of DMVPN, this means that routes learned from a spoke will not be sent back out to other spokes through the same hub interface. To solve this issue, split horizon must be disabled on the tunnel interface of the hub router (R1) using the command 'no ip split-horizon eigrp 10'. This allows the routes from one spoke (R2) to be advertised to other spokes (R3) via the hub. Disabling split horizon on the physical interface of R1 would not resolve the issue since it wouldn't affect the logical tunnel interface used for the DMVPN configuration.
Answer D is correct: https://networkdirection.net/articles/routingandswitching/dmvpn/dmvpn-and-dynamic-routing/
Given answer in correct .
D correct
D is corerct