How do cloud deployments compare to on-premises deployments?
How do cloud deployments compare to on-premises deployments?
Cloud deployments are known for their ability to provide better user experiences across different world regions because they can leverage the global infrastructure of cloud service providers. This allows for lower latency and consistent performance regardless of the user's location. In contrast, on-premises deployments can often be limited by the geographic location of the physical infrastructure, making it more challenging to ensure a similar user experience in diverse regions.
The answer is A Regards
A for me
A is clear and true for me
I think A sounds bettter Easily deploy your application in multiple regions around the world with just a few clicks. This means you can provide lower latency and a better experience for your customers at minimal cost. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/aws-overview/six-advantages-of-cloud-computing.html
A .............
i vote for D here. i find more on that subject when talking about the diff.
D: "Cloud deployments are inherently unsecure, whereas a secure architecture is mandatory for on-premises deployments." - what is so inherently unsecure about cloud, compared to on-prem? - why do you think a secure architecture is mandatory for on-prem? On-prem means you're basically owning the infrastructure. Nobody forces you to do anything. You can configure a server with no protection whatsoever and make it public to the internet if you really want it.
A is Correct
...........................
A is Correct. not completely but the other options are completely wrong
A is the better...