An engineer needs a wireless design to provide redundancy for APs at remote sites that are connected to Cisco 3504 Wireless LAN Controllers. The central Cisco 5520 Wireless LAN Controller supports 2000 APs and has 1975 access points associated to it. The engineer decides that not all APs at the remote sites must remain functional in the event of a failure. How does the engineer ensure that the most important access points at the remote sites remain online while not impacting the main site?
The engineer must ensure that the most important remote site access points are given higher priority to remain functional in case of a failure. To achieve this, enabling Global AP Failover Priority allows assigning different priorities to APs. Setting the 1975 main site APs to a 'high' priority and the 25 most important remote site APs to 'critical' ensures that these crucial remote site APs will stay online during a failure, while the main site APs remain unaffected. Therefore, enabling Global AP Failover Priority and adjusting the AP priorities correctly is the best approach.
AP fallback is something different , AP failover priority is the KEY her e, from 5520 nothing should not happen to the 1975 APs . only the most important 25 APs from remote site should be conneted here .which means most important 25 Aps should have priority more than 1975 APs.
Correct. No impact to the 1975 APs meaning it can only take 25 more APs from the remote site since it only supports 2000
D 1. To configure this feature, you must enable failover priority on your network and assign priorities to the individual access points. 2. By default, all access points are set to priority level 1, which is the lowest priority level. Therefore, you need to assign a priority level only to those access points that warrant a higher priority.
I'm sorry, D is wrong.