Refer to the exhibit. An engineer must implement HSRP between two WAN routers. In the event R1 fails and then regains operational status, it must allow 100 seconds for the routing protocol to converge before preemption takes effect. Which configuration is required?
To ensure R1 allows 100 seconds for the routing protocol to converge before preemption takes effect upon regaining operational status, the correct configuration on R1 should include 'standby 300 preempt' to enable preemption and 'standby 300 delay minimum 100' to set the delay before preemption. This configuration guarantees that R1 will wait 100 seconds before attempting to become the active router again, providing sufficient time for the routing protocol to stabilize.
The correct answer is "B" interface Gi0/0 standby 300 preempt standby 300 delay minimum 100 This configuration on R1 includes the "standby 300 preempt" command, which enables preemption. The "standby 300 delay minimum 100" command sets a minimum delay of 100 seconds before preemption takes effect. This delay ensures that the routing protocol has enough time to converge before the primary router (R1) takes over again after recovering from a failure.
Would the delay (along with the preempt) then not need to be configured on R1 ? So option B ?
Above was my reaction to ROBZY90. Option B looks to correct to me.
Answer is B
minimum <seconds> (Optional) Specifies the minimum delay period in seconds. The seconds argument causes the local device to postpone taking over the active role for a minimum number of seconds since that device was last restarted. The range is from 0 to 3600 seconds (1 hour). The default is 0 seconds (no delay).
You would apply the MINIMUM preempt delay time on R2
B should be enough to accomplish this task
The answer is B because the question ask for delay preemption in R1 when recovering
B is the correct one.
B should be enough to accomplish this task
the answer is C. ref: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp_fhrp/command/fhp-cr-book/fhp-s2.html#wp3701602596 minimum parameter is for the next new master, when the actual fails by example, the new master waits the time setted. So, in this case, minimun is for R2 not R1. sync parameter will make the higher priority router active with a delay. in this casem for R2
sorry, Correction. It's B. The delay minimun is for local device in this case R1
There are no correct options on this. The close is C