Exam 300-410 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Go to Exam
Question 488

Refer to the exhibit.

While troubleshooting an EIGRP neighbor adjacency problem, the network engineer notices that the interface connected to the neighboring router is not participating in the EIGRP process. Which action resolves the issue?

    Correct Answer: B

    The issue arises because the interface FastEthernet0/3 is part of the VRF CLIENT1, and it's not included under the EIGRP configuration for that VRF. To resolve this, EIGRP needs the correct network statement under the specific VRF configuration. Therefore, configuring the network command under the EIGRP address family vrf CLIENT1 will ensure that the interface FastEthernet0/3 participates in the EIGRP process.

Discussion
ZamanROption: B

B Answer is correct router eigrp 1 ! address-family ipv4 vrf CLIENT1 network 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.255 no auto-summary autonomous-system 1 exit-address-family

dapardoOption: C

Actually its b and c combined, but will choose C considering that we need ipv4 for the address family first

yoxivi7892Option: C

Peak Cisco. The old trap or typo? A. Nope. B. There is no "address family vrf CLIENT1." however ... C. There will be an "address family *ipv4* vrf CLIENT1." D. Nope

[Removed]

Actual answer is a combination of B and C. Address-family ipv4 vrf 'name'

Tester948Option: C

Should be C: R7(config)#router eigrp 100 R7(config-router)#add R7(config-router)#address-family ? ipv4 Address family R7(config-router)#address-family ip R7(config-router)#address-family ipv4 ? unicast Address Family Modifier vrf Specify parameters for a VPN Routing/Forwarding instance <cr> R7(config-router)#address-family ipv4 vr R7(config-router)#address-family ipv4 vrf ? WORD VPN Routing/Forwarding instance name