A new application is being developed with specific platform requirements. The platform and application deployment and the ongoing platform management must be fully automated. The application includes a large database component that has significant disk I/O requirements. Which application deployment type meets the requirements?
To meet the requirement of fully automated platform and application deployment with ongoing platform management, containerization is the best option. Containers offer a consistent deployment environment across different platforms and can be easily scaled and managed through orchestration tools like Kubernetes. They are well-suited for applications with significant disk I/O requirements because they can be deployed on infrastructure that meets these performance needs. Additionally, containers facilitate automation and self-healing, important for maintaining high availability and efficiency.
Based on the requirement "significant disk I/O requirements" I would select Bare Metal here.
Bare metal doesnt fit with fully automated
D. container Netacad 7.1.6 Distributed and Dynamic Applications: Another Case for Automation Infrastructure automation tools - Increasingly, the dynamism of microservice-based applications is provided by infrastructure. These container "orchestrators" like Kubernetes or Mesos, automate on-demand scaling, self-healing, and more.
Correct Answer should be D
Should automated
specific platform requirements -> container
To meet the requirements of an application with specific platform requirements and a large database component with significant disk I/O requirements, it might be best to use a containerized application deployment type. Containerization involves packaging an application and its dependencies into a container, which can be easily run on any platform that supports the container runtime. This allows the application to be deployed and run consistently across different environments, without the need to worry about platform-specific dependencies or configurations.
Here is the key.. "The platform and application deployment " Ans. B.
Correct, as per the question Platform Management must be fully automated. Which is possible with Virtual Machine.
For vehicle choice Miata is always the correct answer, for software development container is always the way to go.
What rules out bare metal?
Fully automated is not always available for bare metal
I think it is D. Python environment is for testing (pyats) Container fits all requirements
Containers can be installed in VM or bare Metal. Based in bare metal gets better performance. It means that Container must be used what ever the platform... Answer D
ITS DDDDDD
I think its C: Bare metal is the best choice for an application with significant disk I/O requirements because it provides direct access to hardware without virtualization overhead. While bare metal does not include built-in full platform automation, it can be fully automated using tools like MAAS for provisioning, Ansible for configuration management, and Kubernetes (via Kubespray or RKE2) for orchestration. Terraform and monitoring tools like Prometheus and Grafana can further automate ongoing platform management. Virtual machines and containers introduce performance overhead due to abstraction layers, making them less suitable for high disk I/O workloads. With the right automation stack, bare metal offers both high performance and full automation.