Refer to the exhibit. The ASA_1 acts as a Layer 3 gateway for all servers. The servers lose the gateway connectivity when the vPC peer links go down and the vPC keepalive remains up. Which action improves the high availability in the network?
Refer to the exhibit. The ASA_1 acts as a Layer 3 gateway for all servers. The servers lose the gateway connectivity when the vPC peer links go down and the vPC keepalive remains up. Which action improves the high availability in the network?
The correct answer is to enable the vPC peer gateway feature on the vPC devices. The vPC peer gateway feature allows the vPC devices to route traffic for each other, allowing them to maintain Layer 3 connectivity even if the peer link goes down but the vPC keepalive link remains up. This ensures that the servers retain their gateway connectivity. This solution directly addresses the problem described, enhancing high availability in the network.
B is correct answer https://community.cisco.com/t5/server-networking/vpc-orphan-port-suspend/td-p/2131204
vPC orphan ports suspend feature was developed for single-attached devices to vPC domain and optionally working in active/standby mode (firewall or load-balancer for instance). When a vPC peer-link goes down, the vPC secondary peer device shuts all of its vPC member ports, but it does not shut down vPC orphan ports. With vPC orphan-ports suspend configured, an orphan port is also shut down along with the vPC member ports when the peer-link goes down (figure 98). When the vPC peer-link is restored, configured vPC orphan ports on the secondary vPC peer device are brought up along with vPC member ports.
Doesn't activating orphan port suspend drops the traffic and how is it HA solution.
I believe answer is C .
B must be the answer , as per question firewall not in VPC but orphan , orphan-port suspend feature must be configured to avoid outage
A - does not have any sense here, C - is incorrect as vPC devices are not working as gateways D - IP redirect is for Multicast Sooo >>> B