What is a principle of a code review process?
What is a principle of a code review process?
A principle of a code review process is that naming standards must be consistent. Consistent naming standards help maintain readability and understanding in a codebase by ensuring that everyone uses the same conventions. This aids in maintaining clarity and reducing the likelihood of bugs or confusion. Although other aspects, like timing and approvals, can be important in specific workflows, maintaining consistent naming standards is a foundational principle in improving and maintaining the quality of the code.
I would pick C
I think C
branch -> develop -> commit -> pull request -> code review -> merge or comment. I think "A" is answer.
Answer C: Code review really has two purposes: Improving the code. Finding bugs, anticipating possible bugs, checking the clarity of the code, and checking for consistency with the project’s style standards.' Improving the programmer. Code review is an important way that programmers learn and teach each other, about new language features, changes in the design of the project or its coding standards, and new techniques. In open source projects, particularly, much conversation happens in the context of code reviews.