John detected high load on sync interface. Which is most recommended solution?
John detected high load on sync interface. Which is most recommended solution?
The most recommended solution to handle increased load on the sync interface is to add a second interface to handle sync traffic. This approach distributes the load, ensuring that synchronization does not become a bottleneck and performance is maintained. Unlike delaying synchronization or not synchronizing certain types of connections, adding a second interface directly addresses the problem of high load without compromising the integrity and reliability of synchronization.
Correct answer is D. CCSE documentation page 530.
CCSE Page 530 "ClusterXL by default synchronizes most TCP. UDP and other services excluding a few such as IGMP protocols. Broadcast and all multicast traffic information is not synchronized. The administrator may choose not to synchronize specific services for various reasons such as: • To improve the performance of the cluster • The service uses short connections. e.g. ONS and HTTP Two service objects. one without and other with synchronization"
Answer is D
Apologize. I have investigated little more and it seems to be A https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Maestro_AdminGuide/Topics-Maestro-AG/Configuring-services-to-synchronize-after-delay.htm