When using Monitor Sessions with a destination of the CPU, it is impossible to forward an entire 10Gbps worth of traffic due to internal COPP policies. How might you successfully use this feature given these constraints?
When using Monitor Sessions with a destination of the CPU, it is impossible to forward an entire 10Gbps worth of traffic due to internal COPP policies. How might you successfully use this feature given these constraints?
When using Monitor Sessions with a destination of the CPU, the significant challenge is the inability to forward an entire 10Gbps worth of traffic due to internal Control Plane Policing (COPP) policies. To address this constraint, packet truncation can be utilized. Packet truncation reduces the size of each monitored packet, thereby minimizing the amount of data sent to the CPU. This approach allows for an effective means of traffic analysis while staying within the CPU’s processing capabilities.
I would say packet truncation. For me, the ACL method is when you have a specific source/destination you want to mirror. Though the ACL method would reduce the impact on the CPU, but the question is geared around the entire 10G of the port that is being mirrored. So I would say Packet truncation as the final answer.. So B.
why dont B and C