A project manager has been working with the same group of stakeholders for 3 years using a predictive approach. The stakeholders have invested in many projects and are familiar with the approach. Recently, the organization has strongly encouraged all project managers to adopt an agile approach. This was announced 2 weeks before the project manager planned to kick off a large, complex project with the same group of stakeholders.
What should the project manager do?
The organization has strongly encouraged all project managers to adopt an agile approach. Given this directive, it is essential for the project manager to align with the organizational strategy. Implementing the agile approach in the new project and providing agile training for stakeholders who are unfamiliar with it ensures both compliance with the organization's directive and support for stakeholders during the transition. This proactive approach helps integrate the new methodology while addressing any knowledge gaps, ultimately facilitating a smoother transition.
I dont understand why "D" can't be the answer. Everyone knows everyone, talk about it before jumping in and see what everyone has to say.
C is the answer. The company decides to use agile. End of story. Now you must train the stakeholders.
Everyone says that D is the answer I want to tell me if stakeholders decide to choose predictive you will go against the company and you will return to predictive approache?
As PM you are the professional here. A client may ignorantly recommend an approach. It is your duty to enlighten him and provide insights to enable him make an informed decision.
Share and discuss the pros and cons of adopting agile with the stakeholders and choose the approach they prefer for the new project.
Company wants that but is it the best approach? Ask the team to find consensus.
i guess it is C as the organization has strongly encouraged all project managers to adopt an agile approach
Ans C The question states ”organization has strongly encouraged all project managers to adopt an agile approach”. Given this situation, the Project manager will be found at fault if they do not take measures to move to agile. The question does not state that the Orgn will give flexibility. So best choice is C.
I will choose D
sorry i think D is correct, which involves discussing the pros and cons of Agile with stakeholders and making a collective decision, is seen as more balanced and respectful of the long-term relationship with these stakeholders. It provides a platform for education, buy-in, and potentially a smoother transition to Agile if that's the path chosen.
it's answer
There are a answer is question.
changed from C to D Let's find the best approach together.
This option strikes a balance between adopting the organizational mandate for agile and considering the familiarity of stakeholders with the predictive approach. By choosing the agile approach, the project manager aligns with the organization's direction while acknowledging the stakeholders' need for adaptation. Scheduling agile training for stakeholders who are new to this approach demonstrates a proactive effort to bridge the knowledge gap and facilitate a smoother transition.
Choosing which approach is PM decision and responsibility with consideration of organization status. It should not based on stakeholder preference.
While stakeholders may be familiar with the predictive approach, it's worth considering the advantages of agile, especially for complex projects. However, it's crucial to engage stakeholders in this decision-making process rather than imposing a new approach on them abruptly. (encouraged)
D. Share and discuss the pros and cons of adopting agile with the stakeholders and choose the approach they prefer for the new project
D - My Stakeholders aren't going to be thrilled if I force agile on them.