A project manager is managing a complex research project with a high level of uncertainty. A request is made to implement a mechanism to measure the quality of the deliverables.
Using a hybrid approach, what techniques can be used to achieve this goal?
To measure the quality of deliverables in a project with high uncertainty using a hybrid approach, combining agile and lean methodologies can be effective. Scrum master reviews ensure that deliverables meet the defined quality standards through continuous oversight and coaching. The quality Kanban method provides a visual system to manage and improve work processes, allowing the team to identify bottlenecks and maintain a focus on quality. Together, these techniques support a comprehensive mechanism to measure and enhance the quality of deliverables.
Paired Work will improve quality, and the question is asking about a method to measure the quality. i will go for D
I think you are right Paired programming is an agile development technique in which 2 developers/engineers work together at the same workstation using same keyboard at a time,to improve the quality of deliverable. The main advantages of paired programming are: -Better quality.
paired work MAY improve quality but it is NOT a mechanism to measure the quality of deliverables. also I am not sure how this is referring to D. which is also nothing to do with measurement of quality.
Pairing is the only way in the given options to measure quality. Any other thoughts?
pairing does not measure quality of deliverables. a scrum master review can as well as a quality kanban method.
AB is pure agile methods, C is to improve quality but not for quality measurement, only D is applicable to a hybrid approach.
In general, pair work provides a major increase in quality, at the cost of a minor decrease in speed.
The correct answer is D. "Time-boxed iterations and standup review meetings." Time-boxed iterations, commonly used in agile approaches such as Scrum, allow the project manager and team to work in fixed time frames known as sprints. At the end of each sprint, a review meeting, often referred to as a sprint review or demo, is held to showcase the completed work to stakeholders. This provides an opportunity to assess the quality of the deliverables against the project's objectives and requirements. Standup review meetings, also known as daily standups or daily scrums, are short daily meetings where team members discuss their progress, any challenges, and plans for the day. While these meetings primarily focus on coordination and communication, they also create an environment for identifying potential quality issues early on and addressing them promptly. By using time-boxed iterations and conducting regular standup review meetings, the project manager can keep track of the project's progress, assess the quality of the deliverables, and make necessary adjustments to ensure quality is maintained throughout the project.
The question is asking a mechanism which can improve productivity. Timeboxing makes the team more focusing, reduce unnecessary perfection and discussion. Daily stand up meeting help to de-risking so improve quality, preventive cost is less than rework cost. so I select D. These are the build -in merit of agile which can improve quality and productivity
I think option A is the right answer. A, B, and D can serve as "a mechanism to measure the quality of the deliverables," but I consider A to be the most fitting choice for "a hybrid approach."
The questions says to MEASURE quality of deliverables not to improve quality of deliverables as in the case of pair work.
Stand-ups and sprint reviews would be ok as a measure to deliver in increments and review on time. But 'standup review' is not a meeting that exists...
Well said, standup review meetings isn't a thing in project management. Hence, the option D is wrong.
But like... I'm even more confused
quality in Agile through time boxed iterations and satnd up review meetings
The project manager can opt for A. Scrum master reviews and the quality Kanban method. In a complex research project with high uncertainty, using a hybrid approach that combines agile methodologies (like Scrum) and lean methodologies (like Kanban) can be beneficial. Scrum master reviews: The Scrum Master can review the deliverables to ensure they meet the defined acceptance criteria and quality standards. This can help in identifying any issues early and take corrective actions. Quality Kanban method: Kanban is a lean method to manage and improve work across various systems. This visual system for managing work as it moves through a process allows the team to see the state of every piece of work at any time. This can help in managing the workflow, reducing bottlenecks and improving the overall quality of the deliverables.
D is the right answer
Here's why: Scrum master reviews: Scrum masters provide ongoing oversight and coaching, ensuring the team adheres to defined quality standards and practices. They can review work throughout the sprint, identifying potential issues early. Quality Kanban method: This visualizes quality-related tasks alongside regular development work, making it clear how quality checks fit into the workflow. It facilitates prioritizing and tracking quality tasks, ensuring they don't get neglected.
D. "Time-boxed iterations and standup review meetings." - Time-boxed iterations (like sprints in Scrum) allow teams to focus on a set amount of work in a defined period, ensuring that they regularly produce potentially shippable increments. Regular "standup review meetings" (or sprint reviews) allow the team to demonstrate their work to stakeholders and get feedback, ensuring alignment with quality and other requirements.
D. Time-boxed iterations and standup review meetings
B should be answer
Change to D