A project manager is using a hybrid approach for a project. The project team created and reviewed the risk log with the stakeholders at the beginning of the project. However, midway through the project, the project team and stakeholders became misaligned with the risks and mitigation strategies.
When should the risks be reviewed to ensure alignment between the project team and the stakeholders?
In a hybrid project management approach, it is important to frequently reassess risks and ensure alignment between the project team and stakeholders. Reviewing risks during each iteration and review allows for regular and consistent updates, ensuring that any changes in the project environment or stakeholder perspectives are promptly addressed. This iterative review process helps maintain effective communication and alignment on risk management strategies throughout the project lifecycle.
D: Risks should be addressed during the iteration and reviews. Retrospectives are for team improvements.
Reviewing risks during each iteration and review meeting enables for frequent and regular assessments. B is mostly focuses on team performance
As part of each sprint or iteration, the risk management processes are conducted to ensure that risk is given enough attention. Although the risk management plan is created at the start of the project, through each iteration the process is continually reviewed and updated as the project progresses.
risk need to review in regular basis . in each iteration better then retro.
Frequent review and discussion of risks during each iteration and review cycle help maintain alignment between the project team and stakeholders regarding risk identification, assessment, and mitigation strategies. This approach facilitates ongoing adjustments and ensures that risk perceptions remain consistent throughout the project lifecycle.
C. During the risk register update Not sure, but in my understanding, the retrospective meeting is for improving process or something. So, I guess B is not...
For people saying D, as far as I know the iteration review involves customer so its a no-no. Option B is correct because Risk retrospectives also involve assessing the efficiency of risk response strategies and the effort spent on the risk process. Such evaluations provide rich insights to improve future risk management, creating a more resilient organization.
B. Pendant les rétrospectives Les rétrospectives, typiques des méthodes agiles, sont un excellent moment pour l’équipe de projet de réfléchir sur les itérations passées, y compris la gestion des risques. Cependant, elles ne couvrent pas toujours la participation des intervenants externes, ce qui est crucial pour une harmonisation complète. D. Lors de chaque itération et révision Revoir les risques à chaque itération et révision est une pratique courante en gestion de projet hybride (combinant des éléments des méthodes prédictives et agiles). Cela permet de réévaluer fréquemment les risques avec l’équipe de projet et les intervenants, assurant une réaction rapide aux changements et une meilleure harmonisation.
In a hybrid approach, where elements of both predictive (traditional) and adaptive (agile) project management methodologies are used, it's crucial to maintain alignment between the project team and stakeholders regarding risks and mitigation strategies. In an agile context, iterations and reviews provide opportunities to reassess and adapt the project plan, including the risk management approach. Regularly reviewing risks during each iteration and review allows for ongoing communication and collaboration between the project team and stakeholders. This iterative approach ensures that any changes in project conditions, priorities, or stakeholder perspectives are promptly addressed, and the risk management strategies remain aligned with the project's objectives. It also aligns with the agile principle of responding to change over following a plan.
Retrospectives are focused on what have been done and ways of improvement to take the improvements to the next iteration while iteration and reviews is not focused on teams improvements but demos on how to get stakeholders feedback on a working feature.