Exam RHIA All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 132

Case Study #1 -

Dr. Roberts, an orthopedic surgeon, and Nurse Parrish head nurse on the orthopedic surgery unit, have had an acrimonious working relationship for years. While making rounds on the unit, Dr. Roberts discovered that the physical therapy evaluation he has ordered for one of his patients had not been performed and became outraged. Even though he did not have proof, Dr. Roberts placed the blame for missed evaluation with Nurse Parresh. Dr.

Roberts wrote in the patients medical record that Nurse Parrish frilled to properly order the physical therapy evaluation because she was incompetent and could not be trusted to carry out even the simplest order. After heaving read Dr. Roberts note, Nurse Parrish countered by making a disparaging remark about Dr. Roberts to the medical personnel at the nurces station. Nurse Parrish stated that Dr. Roberts was one who was incompetent and was responsible for the needless suffering of countless patients over the years.

Referring to Case Study #1, the oral statement by Nurse Parrish about Dr. Roberts's professional practices at the nurses' station can constitute

    Correct Answer:

    The oral statement made by Nurse Parrish about Dr. Roberts' professional practices at the nurses' station constitutes slander. Slander refers to making a false, spoken statement that damages someone's reputation, whereas libel refers to written defamation. Perjury involves lying under oath, which does not apply in this situation. While defamation is a general term encompassing both slander and libel, slander is the more specific term for spoken defamation.

Discussion
nanaOption: B

Oral is Slander Libel is Written